Ydeevne her lider under rekursiv CTE. CTE i sig selv er bare syntaktisk sukker.
Bare for denne specifikke eksempeldata virker dette uden gentagelser:
Declare @Tbl as Table(SNO Int,Credit Money,Debit Money,PaidDate Date)
Insert into @Tbl
SELECT * FROM (VALUES (1,0,12,'7Jan16'), (2,10,0,'6Jan16'), (3,15,0,'5Jan16'), (4,0,5,'4Jan16'), (5,0,3,'3Jan16'), (6,0,2,'2Jan16'), (7,20,0,'1Jan16')) AS X(SNO,Credit,Debit,PaidDate);
With CTE1 As (
Select *
, CASE WHEN Credit > 0 THEN LEAD(1 - SIGN(Credit), 1, 1) OVER (ORDER BY SNO) ELSE 0 END As LastCrPerBlock
From @Tbl
), CTE2 As (
Select *
, SUM(LastCrPerBlock) OVER (ORDER BY SNO DESC ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING) As BlockNumber
From CTE1
), CTE3 As (
Select *
, SUM(Credit - Debit) OVER (PARTITION BY BlockNumber) As BlockTotal
, SUM(Credit - Debit) OVER (PARTITION BY BlockNumber ORDER BY SNO ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING) As BlockRunningTotal
From CTE2
)
Select SNO, Credit, Debit
, CASE WHEN BlockRunningTotal < 0 THEN -BlockRunningTotal ELSE 0 END As TotalDebit
, CASE WHEN BlockRunningTotal > 0 THEN CASE WHEN Credit < BlockRunningTotal THEN Credit ELSE BlockRunningTotal END ELSE 0 END As Amount
, PaidDate
From CTE3
Order By SNO;
Dette kan hjælpe med at evaluere ydeevnen, men det vil mislykkes, hvis i en bloktotal Debit
s overstiger det samlede antal Credit
s. Hvis BlockTotal
er negativ, skal den flettes med en eller flere efterfølgende blokke, og det kan ikke gøres uden iteration eller rekursion.
I det virkelige liv ville jeg dumpe CTE3 ind i den midlertidige tabel og cykle over dens fletteblokke, indtil der ikke er flere negative BlockTotal
s.